Doctrinal Differences
I believe that embracing sound doctrine is a good thing, and that following false doctrine is the fast road to ruin. This message isn’t about the value of having sound doctrine but how we prioritize doctrine in our lives—particularly as beliefs come into conflict.
I have thousands of friends on Facebook; Catholics, Protestants, Pentecostals, Charismatics, Mormons, Mystics, and people of other faiths. They all have different beliefs about God, which can be called ‘doctrines’.
Many of us have been taught to separate society into two groups; one with ‘right’ doctrine, and another with ‘wrong’ doctrine. We’re told to associate only with those who have ‘right’ doctrine and avoid people with ‘wrong’ doctrine.
There’s just one problem with that notion. Jesus didn’t die to give me right doctrine. He died to give us His life. He died for people, not doctrine. And you are one of the people He died for. If He values you that highly, I ought to as well. I value people more highly than belief systems. It’s worth remembering that God isn’t a belief system. He lives outside of any belief system man ever came up with, though many have chosen to make of deity out of their belief system.
When I run into people with doctrines I don’t fully agree with, I keep in mind the fact that the things I believe about God today are different from the things I believed five years ago. And five years from now, my beliefs will be even different from today. My doctrines—the things I believe about God—are always in a state of change because He continually reveals things to me that I never knew.
So how do I deal with people I disagree with, doctrinally?
I have a couple of choices:
1) I can reject them as a person because of their doctrine. In doing so, I make doctrine more important than them. That’s not consistent with the life Jesus lived, nor the value He places on each of us.
2) I can accept their doctrine, even if it’s false.
3) I can accept them as a person—regardless of their doctrine. This is the choice I usually make when we have things in common, around which we can build a friendship.
If I find a person’s doctrine to be objectionable, I have to decide whether it’s so horribly weird that I can’t be friends with them. I’m not going to say that’s never happened—it has. But it’s extremely rare.
If I want to influence them (leadership is nothing more than influence), perhaps in the area of doctrine, I have to build a bridge of relationship with them, first. If they’re going to heed my instruction, they must first come to trust me. If I build a strong enough relationship with them over time, there may come a day when an opportunity arises where I can discuss their beliefs with them. In every case I can think of when I’ve tried to correct someone’s doctrine before establishing a relationship of trust with them, the individual rejected my views and continued believing their doctrines.
Most of the people I respect have been accused of heresy. I’ve been accused of it more times than I can remember. Some people will never accept us because of our beliefs. And that is a shame because our beliefs should never be a barrier to demonstrating love toward others.
This is a great post, PM. I like how you addressed this. And I couldn’t agree more that “our beliefs should never be a barrier to loving people.” Jesus is always interested in relationships. Thanks for all you share. Love to you my brother.
Thanks for dropping by Michelle.
Love you too, sis!
What exactly is the context context to this write up?. We are called to accept all people as they are, difference in doctrines is only important when it comes to dealing with God. I hope you are not writing this in the light of the controversy of the prayers surrounding the 7 rays of light controversy that was labelled occultic but some regard to be Catholic or New Age.
This article was written in 2012.
According to my research, Jesus, Buddha, Krishna, Socrates and countless other spiritual masters taught people to attain knowledge and to NOT operate on belief (ideologies). Socrates said Gnothi Seauton (Know Thy Self), Buddha called it moksha or liberation, Krishna called it Nirvana or Enlightenment, In Islam, It’s referred to ‘Attaining the Station of Abraham and in ancient Hebrew הי אור literally means ‘to become light’ and of course Jesus called it Atonement (which means exactly what the word yoga is intended to mean)
Here is a debate I just conducted with a biblical scholar on this topic:
https://youtu.be/Fy4IjPQSC_8
Yes even Christians are going against Christians with some of their thoughts . I’m running into it a lot with the injection. I will not take it. I believe this is all about Satan versus Jesus Christ! Thankyou for all of your ( and Denise’s) hard work!
Oh I had written you a year ago about my church and pastor. I have since left that church. I love the people but not their doctrines. Maysel
I agree when you stand strong enough as a Christian.
But, when you are a baby Christian it’s very easy to fall prey to false doctrine.
While this sounds good in theory, this isn’t quite biblical. There are limits put in place for good reason.
When you show acceptance of others and they are preaching a different Jesus, you take part in their sin, by giving them a platform from which they can mislead the flock. This is dangerous territory. It is not always about finding the path towards helping them individually, you have to also appreciate the danger they present to the flock by promoting another Christ.
“Anyone who goes too far and does not remain in the teaching of Christ, does not have God; the one who remains in the teaching has both the Father and the Son. If anyone comes to you and does not bring this teaching, do not receive him into your house, and do not give him a greeting; for the one who gives him a greeting participates in his evil deeds.”
2 John 1:9-11 NASB2020
“For if one comes and preaches another Jesus whom we have not preached, or you receive a different spirit which you have not received, or a different gospel which you have not accepted, this you tolerate very well!”
2 Corinthians 11:4 NASB2020
Biblically we can partner with those of all faiths, but there is a special exception for those preaching another Christ. Specifically those who preach a Jesus but who deny his divinity or humanity. When you confront a spirit but do not know if it is of God or the devil, you ask it who it says Jesus is and it is required to answer accordingly.
I don’t believe Flynn’s prayer rises to that level as Wood suggests, but I’m certainly uncomfortable with it. New age does seem to cross a line into redefining Christ, but Flynn claims it was from his Catholic faith, and he is not directly promoting this other Christ in his prayer.
I would never lend my platform to anyone who preaches a different Jesus. This discussion is about friendship.
This is spot on! Forgive me for adding to your excellent post. But I liken the understanding of God and development of doctrine to the story of the 7 blind men describing an elephant. When it comes to our belief systems every faith has some elements of truth just like the 7 describing the elephant. But none could possibly contain the whole truth. It seems to me that God wanted us to have a relationship with Him and each other above everything else, just as the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are in relationship. And He sent His Son to show us how.
I was thinking of that same story of the 7 Blind men asked by a King to describe an elephant as i was writing. Thank-you. We can not know all of God and at best we can only talk about aspects of God as we perceive and understand them. I wonder how the story would change if a paragraph was added to the ending of what happened when the 7 blind men began talking together….
So true. As humans we are the perfect creations of God, no matter what form we may take. Our egos were created as a means of survival in the realm we currently reside. It is neither good or bad, right or wrong, and yet it is limited. The mind/ego sees everything in terms of cause and effect, linearly. God and the universe are not linear, and he seems unlimited! We struggle to understand as best we can but not all of us understand in the same way or wholly. We then create dogmAs and doctrines to codify what little we do understand. That’s why no sign or doctrine will ever be complete or whole.
I agree with you. We are asked to treat the least of us with the understanding of God’s love I. The best way we are capable of in that moment. We do not need to accept any doctrine or dogma to accept the person as they are. These are limitations. Yet we must not be naive as to their nature. No matter how beautiful a rattle snake may look, it is naive not to treat it as a danger. This is known as discernment. Even Christ practiced this. He did not through “pearls to swine.”
I think the problem is the NWO captured or we might even say created the “ecumenical movement” and effectively made it a pan-liberalism movement. We need a pan-conservative ecumenism, though I fear it would be captured by false flags too. I defend precise dogmatism, every jot and title, but that has it’s place within congregations, “beyond the wall” it should not apply. I remember 30+ years ago in an 8th grade reading class, reading Narnia book 7 and arguing that C.S. Lewis was a Satanist to my teacher and convincing her it was a possible conclusion. (She was a Baptist minister’s wife and her husband studied Greek under my father.) But now I see that C.S. Lewis was mixing metaphors. He created a culture that he mixed Satanism and Islam and arguing for a type of salvation that could apply to some of them. I don’t think he meant that Satanists go to heaven like he made it appear in his book.
As I have heard, C.S. Lewis was an atheist ,who in his journey to disprove the existence of God, he became a Christian. A great book is a summary of his radio dialogs he gave during WW2 for the English people being bombarded by Hitler. It’s called Mere Christianity and gives a great treatise on the existence of God and roll of Christianity under those harsh times. Highly recommend it. The children’s books i thought were more about the trials of Good vs Evil. Aslan the Lion has been considered the incarnation of Christ in that realm…
This is one reason I feel that some Atheist are closer to God than many who claim to be Godly…
As far as Satanists are concerned…”Blasphemy” is the only unforgivable sin. God always has the opportunity to change their hearts and minds otherwise, so there is hope.
My favorite book by Lewis.
Dave,
Heaven is going to “blow your mind,” so to speak. You are open to the truth (reality of God), so God is going to give you the more truth.
When I read your 1st book, I found a page and a half that encapsulated the gospel. I was so impressed by such a short portion of the book.
TRUTH can also be translated as REALITY.
The verse where Jesus said “I am the way, the truth and the life.” can also be translated “I am the way, the REALITY and the life.”
Jesus is the ultimate reality. He is the image of God. He became a man so that we could understand God. God revealed Himself in weakness showing us Himself.
And the last four or five years God has answered several questions I had about scripture. I was never satisfied with the explanation or the meaning of a certain scriptures. God has shown them to me.
It was just a matter of time. When something doesn’t sit right in your spirit or is not complete, hold on to what you know, but be open to more TRUTH.
I want to laugh deep within everytime that happens.
God bless. Keep going strong.
Riverwaters