In this Q anon update, we look at the legal issues Q has brought up including military tribunals and sealed indictments.
Related:
Q Anon July 1 – Conspiracy No More
(Visited 9,922 time, 1 visit today)
My Books on Amazon
My Books on Barnes and Noble
Divine Healing Class
your q anon you was the one on infowars talking about the fake nuke attack on hawaii i recognize the voice
Sorry mate. I’ve never been on Infowars.
Amazing! Thank you for your thoughtful analysis. I have been waiting for a gigantic perp walk ever since the clinton admin.Perhaps finally we’ll get one (praying).
The photo of the man crossing the street in Hong Kong needs more attention from you. (I knkw you’ve been overwhelmed the last few days)
It’s either Prince William (not Andrew), or it’s Joel Getz, the head of the Clinton-connected kindergarten advertised on the English-language banner in the photo (at 107 Portland St in Hong Kong), which is being investigated for serious child abuse claims. https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-11-26/ex-clinton-foundation-official-tied-chinese-kindergarten-embroiled-bizarre-sexual-ab
The “school” is now gone, but right next door is this karaoke brothel
https://scontent-sea1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/fr/cp0/e15/q65/36588268_1673620529426500_6141115012015456256_o.jpg?_nc_cat=0&efg=eyJpIjoidCJ9&oh=bfcca166a164b02cf286a1e134c2602a&oe=5BDB7E04
And apparently it’s a high-security operation.
Keep,up the great work!
Thank you. Those suggestions on the board. Waiting for confirmation from Q.
I thought it could be Eric Schmidt…Google = server.
Prince William in pic? I’m not able to upload photos here but a google image search of him – looks just like Prince William.
That suggestion is on the research board.
It most certainly resembles Wills.
Harry was in Hong Kong some time ago.
Andy has had his travel curtailed ever since he was seen traveling with some unsavories connected to pedophila.
The princes are traveling more and more as they take on more duties, so perhaps Wills’ trip involved more than just the Middle East, dependent on when that pic was done.
i am a little confused, are you saying we are to trust Wray and RR?? Isn’t that opposite of what Q says?
I’m not saying that. Q has said to trust Wray but has never said to trust Rosenstein. I believe Rosenstein was brought in (perhaps unknowingly) to deal with the swamp. We don’t need to trust him because he likely won’t be around long.
Frankly, praying medic, for someone who has stated from his ‘boss’ position that Oversight is Not in the Constitution, p’haps RR should be looking for another job right this moment!
Oh, but wait…..he still has a thousand years to give us, or get it over with a noose or firing squad b/c of all his sedition and maybe treason which will mean a tribunal and a noose or firing squad.
Can’t believe am so casual about that, but that was not the situation before the ACLU said it does not believe in the Constitution, and Democrats showed how Bolshevik they are at ripping us apart, not just the country.
I am working on my blog TheMagaQueen.blogspot.com where I have given you credits. My focus right now is pedophiles. I have done Q in the past but select only a few posts to do. You do such an excellent job of doing the details and check your site before I go anywhere else. Thank you.
Prayers: protection for Q team, PM, Trump and team, Marines, prosecutors and Patriots for protection with the sign of the cross on each in the name of the Father, The Son and the Holy Spirit, in the blood covenant with Jesus and surrounded by the armour of light of God’s radiance and filled and guided by the Holy Spirit with spiritual sense active and alert. To have all plans, communication and resources hidden in Christ from the eyes of the enemy. And, as Moses would say, May God arise and God’s enemies be scattered. Make it so.
In the world of Realpolitik, you can create any type of indictment you want anywhere as long as the judge is wiling to convict in a federal court. The real question surrounds the recourse for appeal. If the Supreme Court is packed with judges loyal to Trump, then they will favor the military tribunal. Any law can be interpreted any which way in the world of politics. The Supreme Court has the final say over military as well. That’s why the Dems are freaking out about the SC appointment. They sealed their fate with their own filibuster.
I don’t really buy the argument that he Dems get security from having Mueller in office. If that were really the plan, we wouldn’t be able to figure it out. They can deduce as much as we can. I think it’s more a display of procedure, so Trump is not perceived as abusive with his power. I wonder if he “Q” channel is being used to throw off the opponent. Remember how Q wrote “Misinformation is necessary” ?
Hi – Just want to mention that the photo ” Inside AIR 1 ” with the reflection of the phone actualy is taken from the outside becoz the windowframe from the oposite window is visible in the edge of the pic – thats why you got a reflection from the outside windowglass ….
There is ample precedent for using a tribunal during a declared war. Tribunals have been used during the Civil War and World War 2.
During a period in which no war has been declared things are different.
The Third Geneva Convention mentions the concept of unlawful combatant, but does use the phrase in the document itself.
The Military Commissions Act of 2006 that was signed by President George Bush gives the President broad discretion to determine whether a person is an enemy combatant.
There is a controversy over whether this law affects the rights of habeas corpus for United States citizens. A couple of points:
Section 948a refers to “unlawful enemy combatants” and does not explicitly exclude US citizens.
The text of the law states that its “purpose” is to “establish procedures governing the use of military commissions to try alien unlawful enemy combatants engaged in hostilities against the United States for violations of the law of war and other offenses triable by military commission.”
The Act denies habeas rights only to aliens, and that US citizens detained as “unlawful combatants” would still have habeas rights with which to challenge their indefinite detention.
From the above we can see that a law created by the cabal is now being used against the cabal. Also, we can see why certain suspects may be wearing ankle monitoring devices versus sitting in jail.
“Who is this?” could be Bill Binney, “thin thread”
I’m new to this site and Qanon and just want to say Thank you. I always new there was governmental corruption but I had no idea just how deep it went. So glad that someone is draining the swamp. I may actually get to see justice being served in my lifetime. Again, thank you..
United flew it’s last 747 flight 11/7/2017 SFOHNL
Thank you for working so hard to help ‘awaken’ people to the evil pervading our great Republic.
I do have, (I recon it is a secondary), a question regarding CIA:
In cutting off the head, by removing nefarious actors, will there be a plan of action for those subjected to “Monarch” or more widespread ‘social engineering’ programs; many victims with lives destroyed.
Good question. I suspect that the President’s people (perhaps including Ivanka) are aware of the problems victims face and are planning some way of helping them.