Was I the only one scratching my head on April 9th, when Sean Hannity said US Attorney John Huber was investigating “leaking?”
Where did Hannity get that idea? No one else (that I’m aware of) has reported that Huber is investigating leaking.
Let’s review what information the Department of Justice has provided regarding Huber’s investigation:
We know that Jeff Sessions appointed “senior federal prosecutors” to look into allegations of corruption in the FBI and the Department’s handling of investigations into the Clinton Foundation and sale of Uranium One. Sessions appointed these prosecutors rather than a second Special Counsel which had been requested by Trey Gowdy, Bob Goodlatte and other members of Congress. According to the letter sent to Bob Goodlatte by Assistant Attorney General Stephen Boyd, that appointment was made on November 13th, 2017. (Link to full document)
The next day, Qanon asked why sealed indictments might be done outside of Washington DC. Since more than 90 percent of the 2016 presidential vote went to Hillary Clinton, it would not be the best venue to impanel grand juries to hear evidence of political corruption.
It wasn’t until March of 2018 that Jeff Sessions made it publicly known that John Huber was the US Attorney he had appointed to investigate allegations of corruption. Recently, it was confirmed that Huber was tasked with investigating the Department’s handling of the Clinton Foundation investigation and sale of Uranium One.
In an April 1, 2019 interview with Mark Levin, Sara Carter and John Solomon dismissed Huber’s investigation as a nothing burger. A head fake. Solomon said this:
“Yes, so I get a hold of a document. It is in the IRS whistleblower complaint put together by some professional former law enforcement people that there might have been criminality inside the Clinton Foundation and my story comes out, gets a lot of attention. Congress is about to hold hearings.
John Huber’s office calls the gentleman who wrote this and says, “Could I have a copy of it?” And they said, “Sir, we sent it to you nine months ago.” He didn’t even know he had it. It tells you something about — maybe I think a lot of people in the Justice Department that think the Huber investigation was ahead made by Sessions to take President Trump’s pressure off. “Oh, we’ll have this guy look at it.” Not much evidence. Not much has happened there.”
Last night, Sean Hannity again claimed that John Huber is merely investigating leaking. That contradicts everything the Justice Department has said about Huber’s investigation.
Why would Hannity make such a claim?
It’s possible that Sean Hannity, John Solomon and Sara Carter are simply mistaken about what and whom Huber is investigating. If that’s the case, then we can’t learn anything about Huber’s investigation from them.
It’s equally possible they are correct and Huber’s investigation is nothing more than a leak investigation. If that’s the case, then many people are going to be disappointed with the outcome of Huber’s investigation.
There is a third possibility. Huber could be investigating FBI & DOJ corruption, Uranium One and all things Clinton. And Hannity, Solomon and Carter might be perfectly aware of it. If that’s the case, then their comments would seem to be an attempt to downplay the importance of Huber’s investigation to prevent any real information from being released about it, publicly.
If you were attempting to prosecute a slippery, cunning and dangerous cabal of politicians and crooked cops, would you make public the details of your investigation and risk tipping them off?
Or as Q put it:
How do you capture a very dangerous animal?
Do you attack it from the front?
Do you walk through the front door?
Do you signal ahead of time you will be attacking?
I don’t believe the three Fox News amigos are ignorant. I also don’t buy the narrative that Huber is investigating leaking. I suspect they know the truth about Huber’s investigation and they’re being told what to say (and what not to say). Critical information must be released at exactly the right time and not before. Q has suggested in a couple of different posts that Hannity, Carter and Solomon are trusted by the President and his team, they’re being protected and they’re being given inside information to help shape the public narrative.
If my theory is correct, Huber’s investigation is one of the most important ever to be undertaken by the Department of Justice. And much to the surprise of political pundits, it will end with the prosecution of hundreds (perhaps thousands) of corrupt people.
We may indeed be watching a carefully scripted movie. If so, we might as well enjoy the show.