When Will the Military Intervene?

The 11th in a series of messages about where America may be headed following the 2020 election.

It is my opinion that at some point, the military will take steps to alter the course our country is currently on. I believe the military’s intervention will impact many institutions of society, including the executive branch. I base that view on several factors, including a series of dreams God gave me around the time of Joe Biden’s inauguration. (That discussion begins here and continues in the posts that follow over the next few weeks.)

People who have commented on this idea say that it seems impossible now since Biden is putting sympathetic people in positions of power in the Pentagon. I don’t have firsthand knowledge of the dynamics at work inside the Defense Department. While it may seem the DoD is being neutered, there will always be a contingent of patriots who could effect a plan of correction. Six days after Biden’s inauguration, Michael Flynn’s brother, Charles Flynn, was promoted to the command of the U.S. Army in the Pacific.

Regardless of which civilians are “in control” at the Pentagon, the warfighters in uniform could decide to remove Biden from office, and there is nothing the Secretary of Defense (or his undersecretaries) could do but resign in protest.

In my dreams, I saw a sudden, unexpected turn of events taken by the military.
When might this happen?
I can’t give a date, but I will speculate about the timeframe based on currently available information. I would emphasize, this is only speculation and not a prediction. 

The situation in Myanmar provides a template, which we can use to plot the course for the removal of a president by the military due to election fraud.

If the U.S. Military were to remove Joe Biden from office, they would need abundant evidence of election fraud on a scale that would cause any rational person to question the outcome of the November 2020 election. Before the military would make their move, I would anticipate the exposure of election fraud to the public.

While it is true that evidence of election fraud was presented in a number of hearings by Rudy Giuliani and Jenna Ellis, the evidence the military would want is the kind likely to be discovered by a forensic audit ordered by a state legislative body. Such an audit is about to commence in Maricopa County, Arizona, where more than 2 million ballots and Dominion Voting Systems hardware and software will be examined. The audit is expected to take 60 days. If evidence of significant election fraud is found in Maricopa County, we can pose a series of questions:

Would Arizona decertify its November election results based on the finding of fraud?
Would Arizona announce Donald Trump the winner?
Or would the Grand Canyon state opt for a new election?
What changes might be made to the state’s election process based on the findings of fraud?
If Dominion Voting Systems is proven to be a culprit in fraud, what do other states do that use Dominion Voting Systems?
Do other states order audits?
Do they decertify their November election results?
Do they make changes to their election laws?

If the 2020 election were proven fraudulent by forensic audit and acknowledged by state legislative bodies, Joe Biden would be an illegitimate president, and something would have to be done to correct the problem. States could independently hold new elections, but any move to overturn the 2020 results would end up in court. Ultimately, these cases would come before the Supreme Court. There is no reason to believe the Supreme Court would get involved in an election case. The DOJ has likewise expressed no interest in election-related issues. That would leave the military to enforce the rule of law.

As to the question of when the military might intervene: I would anticipate their move after evidence of election fraud is discovered and made public. That will take at least 60 days. If they wait for other states to perform audits, I would add another few months to the timeframe. The military may wait until the courts have had a chance to excuse themselves from the matter. That might prolong the timeframe, but not much. SCOTUS has been quick to notify parties when they refuse to hear an election case.

I would anticipate the military’s move sometime after these events have occurred if the redline they intend to use is the exposure of election fraud. If they use a different redline, that would provide a different timeframe. If, for example, Joe Biden were removed from office by another mechanism like the 25th amendment, that could serve as a redline that might cause them to take action. In this case, their goal would not be the removal of Biden, but the prevention of Kamala Harris from being inaugurated.