Q April 8, 2022
8 Comments
I'd love to hear your thoughts
My Books
Linktree
Support Us
Latest Tweets
-
Interesting comment by Gensler. Crypto is a brilliant idea, poorly executed. The few honest brokers in the busin… https://t.co/2raEzWmSx8
-
Julian Assange has lost his appeal against extradition to the US on espionage charges. His lawyers have indicated t… https://t.co/dOdoDx8FIS
-
The reservoir which had been created by the Kakhovka dam in southern Ukraine can no longer supply water to cool rea… https://t.co/cADiuRuMTR
I’m not convinced this is the same “Q” from before. Far from it actually. The tone and childish beer-drinking, flannel shirt-wearing banter sounds more like some punk 20-year-old geeks are trying to pass themselves off as Q. If this is who we have running the country/world behind the scenes, then God help us all. We are like a bunch of turds in the toilet waiting for the lever to be pulled and flush us into oblivion.
Yeah, the tone of these @Q posts are very light-hearted and of course completely different to the chan Q persona. If it is the same Q, then there would be a reason for this change, the decision was probably deeply thought out by multiple people. If Q is an aspect of the military, then you could think of it as kind of benevolent military propaganda. Why would they decide to take this tone? Maybe to add another layer of plausible deniability, maybe to keep the media of their trail or something. I wouldn’t really take the persona at face value, it’s just a facade. I mean if these guys are involved in “project looking glass” level things and balls to the wall in the war against pure evil, I’d imagine that kind of stuff would make you rather stoic and sombre in personality. See how Powell and Flynn post for example, their exposure to this stuff generates a certain stoic persona. Now multiply that by several orders of magnitude for the level of stuff Q would be aware of, exposed to and involved with.
So if it’s the same Q group then I’d imagine the light-hearted persona is a well thought out front which serves some useful purpose of some kind. Probably to play us and the media in some way but to serve some kind of benevolent agenda ultimately in the end.
Is this implying that Gaetz is a bad guy and that he participated in those orgies that Cawthorne talked about?
I did not get that impression, especially with Q’s statement that you can find something to be funny and not agree with the viewpoint of the creator.
April 4. FOUR FIVE. Wonder if 45 was posting about 5:5? EVERYTHING means something.
At what point are coincidences mathematically impossible ?
I have read quite a few of the posts from @Q, there is definitely a change in the writing and expression. I can however say that the information is also taking on a different side of what is happening. The old Q taught us how to chase the crumbs and find the truth, Q gave us time lines and code, we became aware. The new @Q is taking us much further down the rabbit hole, letting us see a totally different side. We are entering a new timeline of events which will take us into new unknown territory, the who and why and our place within. The old Q showed us the way, shined the light, now those of us who followed are about to go deeper time is relevant in the here and now.