Q gives us information about the Mueller report and we look at how the President gets his message out through Sean Hannity, Sara Carter and John Solomon.
Was I the only one scratching my head on April 9th, when Sean Hannity said US Attorney John Huber was investigating “leaking?”
Where did Hannity get that idea? No one else (that I’m aware of) has reported that Huber is investigating leaking.
Let’s review what information the Department of Justice has provided regarding Huber’s investigation:
We know that Jeff Sessions appointed “senior federal prosecutors” to look into allegations of corruption in the FBI and the Department’s handling of investigations into the Clinton Foundation and sale of Uranium One. Sessions appointed these prosecutors rather than a second Special Counsel which had been requested by Trey Gowdy, Bob Goodlatte and other members of Congress. According to the letter sent to Bob Goodlatte by Assistant Attorney General Stephen Boyd, that appointment was made on November 13th, 2017. (Link to full document)
The next day, Qanon asked why sealed indictments might be done outside of Washington DC. Since more than 90 percent of the 2016 presidential vote went to Hillary Clinton, it would not be the best venue to impanel grand juries to hear evidence of political corruption.
It wasn’t until March of 2018 that Jeff Sessions made it publicly known that John Huber was the US Attorney he had appointed to investigate allegations of corruption. Recently, it was confirmed that Huber was tasked with investigating the Department’s handling of the Clinton Foundation investigation and sale of Uranium One.
In an April 1, 2019 interview with Mark Levin, Sara Carter and John Solomon dismissed Huber’s investigation as a nothing burger. A head fake. Solomon said this:
“Yes, so I get a hold of a document. It is in the IRS whistleblower complaint put together by some professional former law enforcement people that there might have been criminality inside the Clinton Foundation and my story comes out, gets a lot of attention. Congress is about to hold hearings.
John Huber’s office calls the gentleman who wrote this and says, “Could I have a copy of it?” And they said, “Sir, we sent it to you nine months ago.” He didn’t even know he had it. It tells you something about — maybe I think a lot of people in the Justice Department that think the Huber investigation was ahead made by Sessions to take President Trump’s pressure off. “Oh, we’ll have this guy look at it.” Not much evidence. Not much has happened there.”
Last night, Sean Hannity again claimed that John Huber is merely investigating leaking. That contradicts everything the Justice Department has said about Huber’s investigation.
Why would Hannity make such a claim?
It’s possible that Sean Hannity, John Solomon and Sara Carter are simply mistaken about what and whom Huber is investigating. If that’s the case, then we can’t learn anything about Huber’s investigation from them.
It’s equally possible they are correct and Huber’s investigation is nothing more than a leak investigation. If that’s the case, then many people are going to be disappointed with the outcome of Huber’s investigation.
There is a third possibility. Huber could be investigating FBI & DOJ corruption, Uranium One and all things Clinton. And Hannity, Solomon and Carter might be perfectly aware of it. If that’s the case, then their comments would seem to be an attempt to downplay the importance of Huber’s investigation to prevent any real information from being released about it, publicly.
If you were attempting to prosecute a slippery, cunning and dangerous cabal of politicians and crooked cops, would you make public the details of your investigation and risk tipping them off?
Or as Q put it:
How do you capture a very dangerous animal?
Do you attack it from the front?
Do you walk through the front door?
Do you signal ahead of time you will be attacking?
I don’t believe the three Fox News amigos are ignorant. I also don’t buy the narrative that Huber is investigating leaking. I suspect they know the truth about Huber’s investigation and they’re being told what to say (and what not to say). Critical information must be released at exactly the right time and not before. Q has suggested in a couple of different posts that Hannity, Carter and Solomon are trusted by the President and his team, they’re being protected and they’re being given inside information to help shape the public narrative.
If my theory is correct, Huber’s investigation is one of the most important ever to be undertaken by the Department of Justice. And much to the surprise of political pundits, it will end with the prosecution of hundreds (perhaps thousands) of corrupt people.
We may indeed be watching a carefully scripted movie. If so, we might as well enjoy the show.
I’ll go on record and say that Julian Assange’s testimony will be a key part of the prosecution of many corrupt people around the globe. It’s hard to appreciate the plausibility of this theory outside of the revelation provided by Qanon but there are other experts who have provided supporting information.
Sean Hannity has interviewed Julian Assange on numerous occasions. That Hannity is so deeply interested in and connected to Assange is a point worth considering on its own (especially if you believe Donald Trump gives him information other journalists don’t have access to). A significant data point was provided when Hannity asked Assange if Russia was the source of the DNC emails published by WikiLeaks. In keeping with his policy of not revealing sources, Assange didn’t name his source but said,
“We can say, we have said, repeatedly that over the last two months that our source is not the Russian government and it is not a state party.”
If, as the mainstream media has claimed for 2 years, Russia is not the source of the DNC emails, who is the source?
In an interview with Dutch TV, Assange brought up Seth Rich, the DNC staffer who was killed not long after WikiLeaks received the DNC’s emails.
Speculation about Seth Rich’s involvement in the DNC email leak/hack has gotten wide publicity from the mainstream media (most of it negative) due to a plethora of YouTube videos attempting to prove he was Assange’s source. Assange didn’t state that Rich was his source but what other reason would he have for mentioning him while emphasizing that his sources take significant risks?
For years, Assange has been free to keep his sources anonymous. As he’s entered into a DOJ investigation, he’ll be compelled to tell exactly who his sources are and provide any corroborating evidence he’s received such as source files.
We know the narrative that Trump colluded with Russia was false. Time and evidence proved it to be a story the deep state pushed on the public, knowing the entire time it was untrue. The narrative that Russia hacked the DNC emails is the flip side of the same coin. Time and evidence will prove that narrative to be a lie manufactured to support the now debunked Russian collusion narrative.
In the post below, Q suggested the UK government has been after Assange because they want to silence him before he discloses what he knows about their involvement in the plot to illegally spy on Donald Trump and his campaign. Assange’s evidence (which apparently includes source files) doesn’t just implicate the UK government but most of Obama’s cabinet and staff and many corrupt people in Congress who were involved in the plot.
Q has suggested that rather than being hacked by Russia, the DNC’s emails were leaked by Seth Rich. Rich was then murdered and Crowdstrike was hired to create fake evidence that fingered Russia as the culprit. (WikiLeaks Vault 7 explains how the CIA’s “Umbrage” program enables users to create false digital fingerprints implicating another entity.)
Q has indicated that the Generals working with Donald Trump expected General Mike Flynn to be attacked by the deep state. The deep state’s distrust of Flynn was evidenced when in 2014, Obama removed him as head of the Defense Intelligence Agency. As head of the DIA, Flynn would have the dirt on nearly every corrupt organization in the world.
The Generals working with Trump anticipated James Comey’s firing and the fact that it would lead to the appointment of a Special Counsel. It’s becoming more clear that the objective was to get Flynn entered into the Special Counsel’s investigation and let him provide the evidence he had about the crimes of corrupt people. While the mainstream media assured us Flynn’s guilty plea pointed to Trump’s eventual indictment, Mueller’s team would have no choice but to accept Flynn’s testimony and whatever evidence he could provide and refer it to the appropriate US Attorney’s office for investigation. The Mueller team’s December 2018 sentencing memo indicated that Flynn was providing testimony into several open investigations. The fact that he has still not been sentenced suggests his testimony is presently ongoing.
Assange has been sitting in the Ecuadorian embassy for years with an outstanding indictment related to a crime he allegedly committed in 2010. A week after our new Attorney General goes on the Spygate offensive, Assange is suddenly apprehended and is in the process of being extradited to the US to face charges.
Military planning at its finest?
I suspect that in the same way General Flynn was entered into the Mueller investigation under the cover of prosecution to expose the crimes of corrupt people, the mainstream media and political pundits will, in ignorance, paint Assange as a criminal (or perhaps a helpless victim) while he provides testimony further incriminating bad actors around the globe.
I’ll close with Rudy Giuliani’s observations about Assange’s arrest:
“Maybe it will shed light on the plot to create an investigation of President Trump based on a false charge of conspiracy with the Russians to affect the 2016 elections. Keep your eye on Ukraine,” Giuliani told the Washington Examiner. “It’s possible with all his sources he might know or have information of how it all started.”
Panic hits Washington DC after William Barr says he believes the Obama administration spied on Donald Trump and we get an update from Q on Julian Assange.
Denise and I have an inside joke about the chorus of a song made popular by The Animals:
I’m just a soul whose intentions are good
Oh Lord, please don’t let me be misunderstood
For most of my life, I’ve felt that no matter what I did, no one understood me. One reason I took up writing was to communicate my thoughts and experiences to the world in an attempt to be understood. The feeling that no one understood me ended the day I met my wife, Denise. She understood nearly everything about me, immediately. The destruction of the lie that no one understood me allowed me to live life on my own terms. It no longer mattered if anyone else understood me and perhaps more importantly, I was no longer motivated by the opinions of others. The demands of others if you let them, can become a cruel taskmaster. For years I jumped through the hoops others set before me in the hope of gaining their acceptance. If you do this long enough, you’ll learn that no matter what you do to please others, you’ll never do enough. Being accepted by God and then by my wife made me realize I didn’t need the acceptance of anyone else. I didn’t need to acquiesce to anyone’s demands. Which brings us to the point of this message.
For months, people have demanded that I respond to various accusations on social media (and 8chan) that call into question my integrity. That is a request I’m not accustomed to receiving or responding to. I’ve been writing publicly for ten years. In that time, most of you have come to know me pretty well. I’ve either established my integrity with you years ago or I did not. If I did, you stuck around. If I did not, you likely moved on. There are new readers (and listeners) here since I began posting about Qanon. Readers who don’t know my history and who I haven’t established credibility with. So let me address a number of concerns. If my answers seem credible, I hope you’ll consider sticking around.
There is the suspicion that I do not have a legitimate non-profit church ministry. That concern is understandable since most ministers avoid politics like the plague but I talk about politics extensively. The Johnson amendment prohibits 501(c)(3) churches and their ministers from endorsing political candidates or parties. For that reason, many pastors shy away from politics. My calling involves the discussion of politics and current events. That’s why Denise and I did not incorporate as a 501(c)(3) but rather, as a 508(c)(1)(a). Churches and their ministers that incorporate under 508(c)(1)(a) are not subject to the Johnson amendment. They’re free to participate in political discussions and are allowed to endorse political candidates and parties.
Another concern has to do with my decision to remove the Paypal button from this website. Those of you who have been around a while know that’s not an unusual thing. Sometimes an element of the website won’t load properly. (Currently, the mobile menu isn’t functioning which is one reason why I’ll be redesigning the website in the coming weeks.)
HEADS UP: In addition to a redesign of this website, we’re creating a sister website at prayingmedic.org. That site will host resources for kingdom teaching and serve as the hub of our online church. Anyone who wishes to support us financially can do so on that website. This website will focus on politics and current events. We hope to add more features related to Qanon here. (Our online healing class will remain a part of this website).
Since I was going to remove the Paypal button from this website soon, I thought it would be best to do it at a time that would further expose the dishonesty of my enemies. As attacks increased, I removed the Paypal button expecting they would take it as a sign that I feared being exposed. Predictably, they pounced. They now had hard evidence (or so they thought) that I’m nothing but a fraud. Never interrupt an enemy when they’re making a mistake. People have been digging for documents to substantiate the claim that we have a 508(c)(1)(a). Here’s a digging tip: 508s do not register with the IRS the way 501s do and are not required to make available to the public the same forms.
I don’t normally respond to trolls or demands that I publicly address accusations but two nights ago, God corrected me on a stance I’d taken. He asked me to post a timeline of events related to Adam Gingrich and the MAGA Coalition. I posted a timeline with tweets to establish when I first heard of Adam and when we parted ways (and why). The timeline can be found here.
On a related matter, there are accusations that people who were once friends with Adam and members of the MAGA Coalition are still connected to them. Old pictures have been posted on social media attempting to prove that Ann Vandersteel, her husband John, Bill Mitchell, me and Carrie Lockhart are secretly friends with Adam and his crew. Ann, John, Carrie, Bill and I have remained friends with each other but once we learned about the sick games Adam has been playing with his followers, each of us for our own reasons severed ties to him.
I’d like to share the reason why I did. For several years, Adam and a handful of his followers have been running what I can only describe as a personality cult. The group meets on his periscope broadcasts. Followers are fed the latest political insider information. Several leaders will be in the chat on the broadcast to whip the audience to support Adam, financially. They attack anyone who comes into the chat who might have a disagreement. At the time I was following Adam on Twitter, I found myself being added to Twitter chat rooms that were moderated by leaders of the group. They coached followers about their views and attitudes toward Adam. Anyone who expressed concern or a negative opinion was quickly reprimanded. If the negative behavior continued, they would be publicly humiliated, first in the chat room and then on a broadcast. I saw this happen to a number of people. Whenever someone left a chat room, they would be added to a different one that was monitored by one of the leaders so their behavior could be monitored.
The chat rooms also had what I would call spies who took screenshots of messages which were sent to Adam to let him know which followers needed to be corrected. (It’s for this reason that I refuse to have a chat room on Twitter or Telegram and I refuse to be a member of any group chat. I realize group chats can be used for good purposes but they can be used to control and manipulate people.) The hallmarks of a personality cult are undying devotion to a leader, conditional acceptance among the group (as long as you follow the prescribed behavior) and hatred toward anyone who dares to leave the group. I frequently witnessed all three of these. The controlling behavior I witnessed is the main reason why I unfollowed Adam.
Lastly, I’ve been accused of making “fake” Q drops. It began when someone noticed a line had been removed from a post by Q that I included in a twitter thread. Truthers being what they are, some people wondered if I didn’t have an ulterior motive for excluding a line from a post. And not just any line but that particular line. Maybe it’s because I’m secretly a Mossad agent, working against Q.
Occam’s razor would suggest a different explanation.
Unlike most people, I don’t take a simple screenshot of a drop by Q and post it on Twitter. That would be the safest way to do it but my workflow is a little more complex. Because I prefer the pink and lavender color scheme, I go to 8chan to get Q posts. Depending on the length of a post, I may take as many as 2 or 3 screenshots to capture the images and text. I then open MS Paint and begin the process of stitching the screenshots together and editing out unwanted data like the links to responses. I format the images to fit Twitter’s recommended image dimensions. (That’s why nearly all my Q post images are horizontal rectangles.)
You’ll notice on any long post, I’ll cut the text into 4 or 5 sections to make it fit properly. I try to accurately reproduce the text and images to the best of my ability. I try to remember to number the sections before I post them. I try to post them in the correct order but sometimes I do this at 2 am on little or no sleep. With more than 3,000 posts so far and a complex workflow, you might expect that I would make a few mistakes.
I’ve accidentally posted sections of a post out of order and on one occasion, I completely omitted one section of a multi-part post by accident. I’ve accidentally cut off the end of a word on a line of text, repeated lines of text that should not have been repeated and omitted lines of text that should have been included. The more one edits Q’s posts, the more likely there are to be mistakes.
The advantage of my system is that it provides readable information for social media and Q seems to appreciate my approach. Many of the “Review time” graphics Q has posted regarding the firing of FBI & DOJ personnel are graphics that I created. No one is more aware of my mistakes than me. I’m taking precautions to be more diligent in reproducing Q’s posts accurately while making them as easy to read as possible on social media.
Thanks for listening and thanks for helping the world see the amazing work God is doing through patriots like Q and Donald Trump.
(If someone would consider posting this on the research board, I’d appreciate it.)
A 2-hour conversation with my friends Shady Groove and InTheMatrixxx about the Qanon movement.