Hatred of 8chan and Q Leads to Libel Litigation

During the last two years, the mainstream media have collectively published hundreds (perhaps thousands) of articles about Qanon. Not one mainstream article, to my knowledge, has had anything positive to say about Q or his followers. Most articles portray Q as a devious prankster or a group of internet trolls and his followers as delusional racists fanatically obsessed with seeing pedophiles jailed. Critics have become so obsessed with destroying Q that they sometimes overstep the law. And now one man is going to court over his hatred of Q and 8chan.

Fredrick Brennan is the founder of the internet message board 8chan where Qanon posts. Jim Watkins assumed ownership of 8chan in 2015 and Brennan stayed on as an employee after the transfer. In 2018, Brennan terminated his employment with Watkins over irreconcilable differences. The summer of 2019 brought a media blitz against Q and 8chan. After a series of mass shootings, the media made repeated accusations (some of which have proven to be false) that 8chan promoted hate speech and violent extremism. The media’s articles were weaponized in an attempt to pressure companies that provide tech service to 8chan to cancel their service agreements. On August 5th, the plan to deplatfom 8chan succeeded. Cloudflare withdrew its service to 8chan, leaving them open to DDoS attacks. The website has been offline ever since.

On September 5th, Jim Watkins testified before Congress and explained the measures he was taking to deal with messages that endorse violence. (People have asked if a copy of Jim’s testimony might be obtained through FOIA, but that is not possible. Congress is not subject to the Freedom of Information Act. The release of the transcript is at the discretion of the committee, and at this time, they have not made it public). Fredrick Brennan took to Twitter on Septemeber 6th and 7th and attacked Watkins claiming, among other things, that he was going senile.

A month later, Brennan explained his motive for the attacks against Watkins and 8chan. He “has a vendetta with them.” (Brennan is also prone to posting tweets that are critical of Q and his followers.)

Defamation is the oral or written communication of a false statement about another that unjustly harms their reputation. Slander is spoken defamation. Libel is written defamation. In most jurisdictions, a case for defamation is based on two things: A false statement of fact, and malicious intent. In two tweets, Brennan made a false statement of fact (the claim that Watkins was going senile) and demonstrated maliciously intent (“I have a vendetta with them”). Watkins and Brennan live in the Philippines where defamation is a criminal matter. Watkins filed a criminal complaint with the local authorities. The complaint alleges that Brennan used the El Paso shooting spree to attack Watkins’ reputation and defame his character. (The full criminal complaint can be viewed here.)

Those who are connected to 8chan and those who support Q (including myself) have been defamed by internet trolls and the media for years and no one has pushed back. Watkins’ criminal complaint is a shot across the bow. A warning to all that false claims intended to harm us and silence our voices will not be tolerated. Though we greatly value freedom of speech and freedom of the press, both have limitations. Defamation should not be accepted by any community. When it is, bullies are emboldened to bring more attacks. The abusive tactics used by the press and social media companies are the reason why Devin Nunes filed lawsuits against Fusion GPS, McClatchy and Twitter. Nunes understands that until someone holds abusive people accountable for their behavior, the abuse will continue.

There are others in our community who probably have grounds for defamation lawsuits. The maker of Q Drops had their app pulled from the Apple store after NBC published an article by Ben Collins which made false statements about Q. The tone of the article made it clear that NBC’s intent was to get the app pulled from the Apple and Google stores. They intended to cause harm (defamation) to a legitimate business. Many of the claims the media make about Q are false and reporters know they are false. Making a statement of fact that you know or suspect is not true in an attempt to harm someone is the definition of defamation. (The maker of Q Alerts also had their app removed from the Apple store.)

Thinking that the first amendment allowed them to say anything they wanted, those who oppose Q and 8chan have had a good run with their libelous statements, but it seems the tide may have turned. Will they finally be held accountable? It will depend on how we, as a community, respond to their behavior.

(I have more articles in the works on this subject so stay tuned.)

The Arrests Are Coming, but When?

My previous two articles (here and here) explored the evidence suggesting that much of the work required to remove corruption is complete. Many people want to know when the arrests are going to happen. Information is available that can be used to create a timeline of future events. But to accurately predict the future, we must first understand the past and present. Let’s briefly review the history of Donald Trump’s presidency and how two groups of people perceive it.

Donald Trump’s Presidential candidacy was opposed by Hollywood, the media, the political establishment, and coastal progressives. His run for the White House was supported by tens of millions of patriotic nobodies. Since the election, progressives and patriots have been watching a dramatic story unfold. There are, in fact, two stories being told, each written by a different author.

what makes a good movie praying medic qanon

Progressives are watching a movie in which a tyrannical, corrupt dictator has been installed in the oval office with the help of Vladimir Putin. The orange despot has bungled every aspect of his Presidency. It is only because of the hard work of dedicated and patriotic career bureaucrats in Washington that Trump’s disastrous foreign policies haven’t caused a nuclear holocaust. Progressives were promised that Robert Mueller would expose Trump’s collusion with Russia and he would be removed from office, but Mueller failed. Fortunately, the heroic Adam Schiff is, at this very moment, gathering the evidence needed to destroy the monster who is ruining our beloved democracy. In this movie, Trump is about to be publicly humiliated and removed from office. The results of the Russia-influenced 2016 election will finally be made right.

On the other movie screen, patriots have watched Trump lose one general after another over his insistence that the bloody and expensive wars in the middle east and Asia come to an end. Trump managed to get Kim Jong Un to the negotiating table and avert a nuclear war with North Korea. He’s brought back jobs that were sent overseas and is fighting Congress and the courts to stem the flow of drugs and criminals who pour through our southern border.

Trump’s Justice Department launched investigations into the many criminal enterprises that were allowed by, and in some cases, initiated by previous administrations. We have confirmation from Attorney General Barr that some of those investigations are complete. The Spygate investigation is now focusing on former CIA Director John Brennan and former DNI James Clapper, two of the top-level people from the Obama administration who plotted the illegal surveillance of Trump’s campaign. (Since criminal investigations begin with lower-level players and work their way up the chain of command, this suggests that the Spygate investigation is also nearing its completion.) Patriots have watched Trump take on the dishonest corporate media and the corrupt political establishment.

Since half of the country is watching a movie in which Trump is about to be removed from office, the sudden and unexpected arrest of his opponents would be viewed as political retaliation. It would only confirm the narrative that the orange man is a dictator who must be removed from office—by force, if necessary. Arrests at this time would cause a civil war. In order to avoid civil unrest, a new public narrative must first be put forth that corrects the false narrative the media has used to deceive half the country.

The new narrative, if it to be believed, must be seen as truthful, authoritative, and non-partisan. It’s been developed, and it has two components. The first part is the Department of Justice Inspector Genera’s report on allegations of FISA abuse. Inspector General Horowitz was an Obama appointee who, in previous reports, failed to deliver the knockout punch conservatives hoped for. James Comey, while quibbling over details of the report on his memos, praised Horowitz’s fair and objective methods. Horrowitz can hardly be considered a partisan hack, which makes him the perfect person to deliver the first installment of the new narrative.

The Horrowitz report will expose the corrupt acts of the Obama administration and their collusion with the media in an attempt to railroad Trump and remove him from office. Those who are watching the orange-man-bad movie will face a plot twist that challenges their beliefs. The IG report will factually and objectively demonstrate that progressive heroes are, in fact, duplicitous criminals who deserve prosecution.

The second part of the new narrative is the declassification of documents by Attorney General William Barr. Trump authorized Barr to declassify anything he wants. Barr can give the declassified documents to anyone who might benefit from them. We know that text messages related to the Russia investigation between Andrew McCabe, James Comey, Bruce Ohr, Lisa Page, and Peter Strzok are on the list of things to be declassified. We also know the gang of 8 intel briefing on the status of the Russia investigation will be declassified. The possibilities for declassification are endless since Barr has complete authority and discretion. The secret communications and reports of those involved in the Russia investigation will be available for the public to read for themselves. The declassified documents will paint a clear picture of the criminal activities of those who tried to remove Trump from office.

Since the false movie narrative is being propagated by the media, along with the exposure of corrupt politicians, the media’s dishonesty must be exposed. The Horowitz report and the release of declassified documents will factually and objectively demonstrate that the media colluded with corrupt politicians and knowingly published false information with the intent of deceiving the public. This will allow the entire nation (and the world) to see the truth.

The Great Awakening is a term I use to describe the public becoming aware of a two-tiered system of justice that has allowed corrupt people to go unpunished. The Storm describes the coming arrest and prosecution of those corrupt people. The Calm Before the Storm is the time we currently live in before the arrests happen. Although the criminal investigations may have been completed long ago, only after the public has accepted the truth about corruption, can the justice phase begin.

I won’t predict a date when the arrests will happen. Everyone who has made such a prediction has been wrong. The political landscape is an ever-changing and unpredictable environment. (Did anyone predict the impeachment inquiry before it happened?) We know that the Horowitz report is nearly complete, but there is no way to predict the exact date it will be made public. The same is true for the release of declassified documents. What I can say is this: we should expect to see arrests after the Horowitz report and declassified documents have been released and the public has had time to digest them and accept the truth about corruption. At that point, those who have been watching the orange-man-bad movie may demand justice for the real criminals.

Get free tips on supernatural living
We respect your privacy.